Every trade in $RES pays a fee. Those fees do not sit in a treasury and they are not burned. They are deployed as liquidity in other pools on Robinhood Chain, where they earn again.
15% of realized profit is paid to holders in USDG. No staking, no claiming, no lockup. The other 85% keeps working.
15%
of realized profit
Paid in USDG, straight to your wallet. The split is a constant in the contract, not a setting anyone can change.
0
actions required
Nothing to stake, nothing to claim, nothing to sign. Holding the token is the whole of it.
85%
stays at work
Retained as capital and redeployed. The position the protocol can take grows with what it has earned.
The cycle
Buying or selling $RES pays a trading fee, the way it does on any pool. That fee is routed to the protocol's vault rather than to a wallet.
A keeper ranks every pool it can reach on Robinhood Chain and opens a concentrated liquidity position in the ones where the fees are expected to beat the cost of the price moving. It checks every minute.
Traders in those pools pay fees to whoever is providing the liquidity. For the duration of the position, that is the protocol.
Fees are swept once they are worth more than the gas to collect them, converted back to USDG, and recorded on the vault as realized profit.
15% of that realized profit is sent to holders in proportion to what they hold. The contract will not let more than that leave.
Distributions
Distributions arrive as USDG in the wallet holding your $RES. There is nothing to claim and no deadline to miss. If you hold the token when a distribution runs, you are in it.
Payouts are on realized profit, not on paper gains. A position that looks good and then gives it back pays nothing, which is the honest way round: you are paid on money the protocol actually has.
Cadence
There is no fixed schedule, and a fixed schedule would be a promise only a gas subsidy can keep. A distribution runs once every eligible holder is owed at least $5.
That ties the cadence to the payout rather than to a clock. More holders means a longer wait and a larger payment, instead of the same payment eaten by the cost of sending it. Holders are paid in rotation, so nobody sits permanently at the back of the queue.
Verification
None of this requires taking anyone's word. The protocol holds its money in one contract and writes what it does to a public chain.
Open positions and what they have earned · Every parameter the desk runs on
Custody
Two keys, and keeping them apart is the design. The keeper is an automated key that runs constantly; it can open and close positions on venues that were approved in advance, and it cannot withdraw anything. If it were stolen, it would be replaced in one transaction and no assets would move.
The owner key can withdraw everything. It is held offline and signs rarely, by hand. That is a real concentration of trust and it is named here rather than buried: the protocol is not trustless, it is constrained.
Risk
When a price moves, a liquidity position ends up holding more of whatever fell. Fees have to beat that, and sometimes they do not. The desk refuses pools where the maths says they will not, but a model that is wrong loses money exactly as fast as no model.
They are tested against a real EVM, and the test suite runs on every change. That is not the same as an audit and is not offered as one.
There is no timelock and no multisig enforcing a delay. Whoever holds that key can withdraw the vault.
15% of nothing is nothing. A quarter where the desk breaks even pays holders nothing, and there is no floor underneath it.
In one paragraph
A token whose trading fees become working capital instead of a treasury balance. The capital provides liquidity, the liquidity earns fees, and 15% of what is actually realized goes to the people holding the token. Everything above is checkable on chain, and the parts that are not yet proven are named as such.